<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Generation Solar</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2010-11-10://2</id>
    <updated>2013-04-12T20:34:22Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 5.031</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Agricultural Solar:  Retrofit Installation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2013/04/agricultural-solar-retrofit-installation.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2013://2.54</id>

    <published>2013-04-05T02:09:31Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-12T20:34:22Z</updated>

    <summary>Here&apos;s another example of agricultural buildings serving double duty.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Commercial Solar PV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Grid Tie" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="PV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Portfolio" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div class="article">

<p>These two barns are in great shape and have had a productive life servicing an active horse operation.  Adding solar was a natural choice for the owner.  Fitting all the desired solar onto the barn roofs was not easy, so the owner, a qualified mechanical engineer, designed his own custom racking system with our help.  The resulting array actually overhangs the roof peak on both barns.  This is normally not a recommended  method to mount a solar array, but in this case the mounting method was supported with appropriate engineering.</p>

<p>This is another example of multiple smaller string inverters chosen to maximize serviceability and minimize down time in the event of a failure:  a vote for long term reliability.</p>

<p>Wiring from the PV combiners was buried under the horse riding ring as well as through the barnyard.</p>

<p>The system is equipped with full weather monitoring for tracking performance against expectation.</p>

<img alt="retrofit solar barn installation" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_2.jpg"  class="mt-image-none" style="" />

</div>

<div id="gallery" class="gallery">
<h2>Project Gallery</h2>
<p class="note">Click to enlarge.</p>
 	<a href="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_combiners.jpg" rel="gallery" class="first"><img src="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_combiners.jpg" title="PV Combiners" alt="Solar image"></a>
  	<a href="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_SMA_inverters2.jpg" rel="gallery" class="first"><img src="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_SMA_inverters2.jpg" title="SMA string inverters" alt="Solar image"></a>
 	<a href="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_weather.jpg" rel="gallery" class="first"><img src="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_weather.jpg" title="Inverter weather monitor" alt="Solar image"></a>
 	<a href="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_microfit.jpg" rel="gallery" class="first"><img src="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_microfit.jpg" title="Original microfit on site" alt="Solar image"></a>
 	<a href="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_combiner_trenches.jpg" rel="gallery" class="first"><img src="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_combiner_trenches.jpg" title="solar wiring in a trench" alt="Solar image"></a>
 	<a href="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_1.jpg" rel="gallery" class="first"><img src="http://www.generationsolar.com/gallery/spirk/barn_solar_array_fit_1.jpg" title="PV on a barn" alt="Solar image"></a>	
 </div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Project Capacity Still Available for Ontario MicroFIT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2013/04/project-capacity-still-available-for-ontario-microfit.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2013://2.51</id>

    <published>2013-04-05T01:39:34Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-11T20:09:56Z</updated>

    <summary>Get your applications in now, folks, as there are only a few MegaWatts left at the current MicroFIT price of 54.9cents/kWh for residential rooftop solar energy systems.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Grid Tie" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Residential Solar PV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The OPA has a 50MW procurement target that is rapidly filling up.  By the end of May we expect the capacity to be allocated, and the MicroFIT rate (the price paid for your power) will drop again, probably by about 10 to 15%.  Call us today to get your MicroFIT application started.</p>


<img alt="Residential garage mounted solar array in cobourg.jpg" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/residential_garage_solar_cobourg.jpg"  class="mt-image-none" style="" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>PV String Sizing and MicroFIT 2.0</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/08/pv-string-sizing-and-microfit-20.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2012://2.50</id>

    <published>2012-08-15T16:47:32Z</published>
    <updated>2012-08-15T17:33:56Z</updated>

    <summary>With the 10kW cap on array sizing in MicroFIT 2.0, new constraints are put on PV array design that will affect your system performance.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Grid Tie" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="PV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Residential Solar PV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>MicroFIT 2.0 defines the 'nameplate capacity' as the larger of inverter size or array size.  in other words, both your inverter and your PV array must be less than or equal to 10kW (=10,000W).  Unfortunately, and strangely, this decision seems to have been made without the benefit of PV design experience.</p>

<p>Most contractors and system designers will be trying to hit exactly 10kW of array size (for systems unconstrained by roof area).  This looks good on paper, but may result in poor system performance over the system's lifetime.</p>

<p>Common PV module sizing includes 250W modules, so 40 x 250W = 10kW quite nicely.  Arrays with 40 modules (regardless of module size) will  be designed in 4 strings of 10 modules.  However, for most grid-tied inverters strings of 10 will result in poor hot weather performance, a problem that will get worse as the modules age.  Such a system could  spend a significant portion of each hot day not producing at all, as the array cannot sufficiently drive the inverter.  (Just think of this past July: hot and sunny.)</p>

<p>Strings of 11, 12, or 13 are a much better design and that's what we use in our designs.  So a system based on 44 x 225W modules = 9.9kW is a more robust design than 40 x 250W = 10kW.  Similarly, 39 x 250W = 9.75kW is more robust than 40 x 250W, even though it's 250W smaller.  In fact, strings of 13 represent the best design, maximizing system efficiency and prolonging inverter life.</p>

<p>String sizing issues can be eliminated all together by using micro-inverters.  Whether or not micro-inverters are worth their premium price will depend on your site details.</p>

<p>Overall preferred system design will be based on your site.  Call us to set up a site assessment and we can recommend a system design for you!</p>

<img alt="FIT solar array ontario riverview.jpg" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/04/18/FIT%20solar%20array%20ontario%20riverview.jpg"  class="mt-image-none" style="" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Ontario Micro Feed in Tariff (MicroFIT) program: Solar for home owners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/07/ontario-feed-in-tariff-fit-program.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2010://2.7</id>

    <published>2012-07-13T14:43:32Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-05T01:48:48Z</updated>

    <summary>As part of the 
Green Energy Act, the Ontario Power Authority has implemented a  Feed In Tariff (FIT) program, that pays a premium price for green electricity produced by home and business owners.   Be sure to check out our FAQ, and contact us to learn how to make the FIT work for you.
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Simon</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Sticky" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[
<h2>
	FIT 2.0 Pricing for PV installations
</h2>
<table class="fit_table" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
	
						<tr class="r1">
							<td>
								&lt;=10kW, roof mount
							</td>
							<td class="values right">
								54.9 cents/kWh
							</td>
						</tr>
<tr class="r2">
							<td>
								&lt;=10kW, ground mount
							</td>
							<td class="values right">
								44.5 cents/kWh
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="r1">
							<td class="label">
								&gt; 10kW &lt;= 100kW, roof mount
							</td>
							<td class="values right">
								54.8 cents/kWh
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="r2">
							<td class="label">
								&gt; 100kW &lt;=500kW, roof mount
							</td>
							<td class="values right">
								53.9 cents/kWh
							</td>
						<tr class="r1">
							<td class="label">
								> 500kW, roof mount
							</td>
							<td class="values right">
								48.7 cents/kWh
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="r2">
							<td class="label">
&gt; 100kW &lt;=500kW, ground mount
								
							</td>
							<td class="values right">
								38.8 cents/kWh
							</td>
						</tr>
					
</table>
<h2>
	Other FIT facts:
</h2>
<ul>
	<li>
		Micro-generation systems (<=10kW) have a simplified application process and have no application fee
	</li>
	<li>
		Contracts are transferable (i.e. if you sell your house you can sell your contract too)
	</li>
	<li>
		Income from the FIT and MicroFIT programs is taxable business income.  The investment is depreciable against it and other income (consult your tax advisor)
	</li>
	<li>
		Systems are eligible for HST tax credits
	</li>

</ul>
<h2>
	If you looked at the MicroFIT program a long time ago, you'll see some changes in the current rules:
</h2>
<p>In general, the changes appear to strongly favour smaller urban rooftop installations over any other type.</p>
<ul>
<li>The OPA will be implementing an Annual Procurement Limit to define how much project capacity it wishes to fund each year. The goal is to reach Ontario's target of 10,700MW of non-hydro renewable by 2015. They have committed to an immediate release of 50MW of microFIT contracts "as soon as possible".
</li>
<li>
The OPA has firmed up the application process. Firm timelines will now be in place for each step of the process. This is a step in the right direction as it gives more certainty to the projects that will proceed and does not allow people to sit on project capacity that could otherwise be used by someone else. Once past initial OPA hurdles, Applicants will have 30 days to obtain utility company Connection Agreement, then 6 months to build the project.  There are many scenarios whereby the OPA can cancel your application (missed deadlines, mainly). Be extremely vigilant about your application process.  Better still, let us do it for you.
</li>
<li>
The project limit is now one microFIT contract per individual/farmer, not per property.  This does not seem to support increased renewable installations in Ontario, but does hold system capacity for more individuals to participate.
</li>
<li>
The definition of Namplate Capacity has changed to the LARGER of PV array size (in kW) or inverter size (in kW).  So maximum array size is now 10kWDC, whereas  Version 1 permitted over-size arrays on a 10kW inverter bank.
</li>
<li>
Ground mounted solar systems are not allowed on (or near) residentially zoned land. If they are on industrial land, they cannot be the primary use of this type of land. MicroFIT systems are still allowed on agricultural land provided residential use is ancillary (most family farms will still qualify, provided they don't abut residential lands).  This will, unfortunately, limit ground mounts in rural residential areas, regardless of property size, proximity to neighbours, etc.
</li>
<li>
Pricing will be updated every year in January.
</li>
</ul>

<p>See also our <a href="http://www.generationsolar.com/faq.html">FAQ</a> (seriously, there's some good stuff there).  </p>

<img alt="Party solar" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/16/murphy.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Buy Local for Best Solar Service</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/03/buy-local-for-best-solar-service.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2012://2.47</id>

    <published>2012-03-28T17:41:49Z</published>
    <updated>2012-03-28T18:56:40Z</updated>

    <summary>A solar energy system represents one of the largest capital investments you&apos;re likely to make in your lifetime.  They&apos;re good investments, they&apos;re very robust, and they&apos;re low maintenance.  Nevertheless, they can, periodically, require the attention of a qualified service technician.  If you want high quality, responsive service to support your investment, be sure to work with a local solar contractor.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>90% of service calls for a solar energy system happen in the first few months after installation.  This is natural, as owners are still growing accustomed to the behaviour and 'personality' of their equipment.</p>
<p>Some sources of concern are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Lack of familiarity.  What does that blinking light mean?  Why is it doing <....>?  How do I know it's working?</li>
<li>Inverter monitoring and communications:   very common source of problems, but usually owing to changes or weaknesses in the owner's home network.  </li>
<li>Questions about system performance:  Am I getting as much energy generated as I should be getting?</li>
<li>Problems with paperwork from the OPA or local distribution company</li>
</ul>
<p>For these and any other concerns we want to be sure that our installation meets your expectations for quality, performance, and function and if we can't solve the problem over the phone, then we'll come to your site.  In order to provide high quality and responsive on-site service we keep our working radius to generally a 1 hour radius of our Peterborough home base.  This includes Peterborough, Norwood, Havelock, Madoc, Lakefield, Northumberland, Cobourg, Port Hope, Clarington, Port Perry, Lindsay, Oshawa, Kawartha Lakes, Buckhorn, Apsley, Fenelon Falls, Tweed, and many points in those areas.  We do work further afield for special projects.</p>
<p>So ask the contractors you're having quote your job where their home base is.  If it's more than 90 minutes away, you can be sure that they will be hesitant to send someone out to investigate a problem because it's just too costly to have that person spend so much time in a truck.</p>
<p>Buy local for best service.</p>
<img alt="cobourg ground mount.jpg" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/03/28/cobourg%20ground%20mount.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New FIT Rates Announced!!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/03/new-fit-rates-announced.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2012://2.46</id>

    <published>2012-03-22T20:11:44Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T20:35:06Z</updated>

    <summary>The Ministry of Energy has announced the results of their FIT and MicroFIT review.  The report includes a number of recommendations that will affect future contracts, including changes to the FIT price structure and project eligibility criteria.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Summary of recommended changes to the FIT and MicroFIT programs:</p>

<p>New Price Schedule:</p>
<img alt="FIT rates 2012.jpg" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/03/22/FIT%20rates%202012.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />

<p>Other significant points:</p>
<ul>
<li>One MicroFIT per owner (was one per property)</li>
<li>CFIT (Commercial FIT, MicroFIT for businesses) will not be launched</li>
<li>No indication about procedure for the new price tranches (ie 10 - 100kW)</li>
<li>MicroFIT projects must be completed in 6 months from approval (same as before); FIT projects must be completed in 18 months (was 3 years)</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="http://www.energy.gov.on.ca/en/fit-and-microfit-program/2-year-fit-review/">Read the full FIT review report here.</a></p>

<p>Next Steps:  The review was conducted by the Ministry of Energy and constitutes recommendations to the Ontario Power Authority (OPA).  The OPA will now create rules and processes to meet the recommendations.  No word on how long that will take.  Final conclusions on the success of the FIT review will depend on the details established in the new rules.</p>

<p>Check back often for updates!<p>

<img alt="FIT array under construction.jpg" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/FIT%20array%20under%20construction.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>No News is No News</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/03/fit-review-news.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2012://2.45</id>

    <published>2012-03-01T20:50:48Z</published>
    <updated>2012-03-01T21:13:17Z</updated>

    <summary>The Canadian Solar Industries Association (CanSIA) has released an update regarding the Ontario Feed-In-Tariff review that is underway.  </summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="fit" label="FIT" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Canadian Solar Industries Association (CanSIA) has released an update regarding the Ontario Feed-In-Tariff review that is underway:  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Ongoing discussions between Ministry of Energy and CanSIA staff have continued throughout the FIT review process. More recently, on February 15th, CanSIA met with the Ontario Premier's Office.</p>
<p>We understand that the Ministry of Energy is carefully reviewing almost 3,000 submissions and is now in the process of making decisions on some of the major program elements, such as FIT prices, local consultations, and the Renewable Energy Approval (REA) process.</p>
<p>The Ministry of Energy and the Premiers Office have stated their commitment to release the results of the review and restart the FIT process as quickly as possible. CanSIA continues to advocate the need to expedite the review, and changes that are needed to the program so that we can bring to fruition a strong solar industry in Ontario. At the same time, CanSIA continues to advise against changes that could harm the solar industry or put jobs and investments at risk.</p>
<p>In particular, CanSIA continues to stress the urgency to have the microFIT program restarted as soon as possible and before the rest of the FIT program. The Ministry of Energy is taking this advice under consideration.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Read the full document:	  <a href="http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=4e7bc4cab&v=001VJlu5GGZPDT7E5W901vYHgU1VtgvnwvMKl4Nbh8PJufEB0WD_3lEiiWdT92Yrj4o4EoaLOyCPsMYBw1APafcXCVQYw1l6Rr18lrgQxBs1qsCX0-MyYx5qXyC05PHZ9YGP5gqoLtL6-y8-BjDJ2ND_55O6z8pA5T_Vkf-HCqPxWnKYcEgr_q7rKJdvNpscsw9Y6r7ZLyBtKzSbHJJmNgq8g%3D%3D">CanSIA Update:  Ontario FIT Review</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.energy.gov.on.ca/en/fit-and-microfit-program/2-year-fit-review/">Comments from Deputy Minister Fareed Amin</a> were released February 7th, 2012.</p>

<p>So, no news is no news.  Not much of an update but, there you have it just the same.  We continue to await release of the new rates and rules in order to get your projects underway, and will keep you updated as new information is available.  </p>

<img alt="rural_solar_array.jpg" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2012/03/01/rural_solar_array.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Beware of Unscrupulous Contractors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/beware-of-unscrupulous-contractors.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2011://2.44</id>

    <published>2011-11-17T19:17:48Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-17T20:30:15Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s come to our attention that some contractors may be applying for  OPA MicroFIT contracts for customers without the customer&apos;s consent or knowledge.  This is dishonest and predatory and can limit your choice as a customer in the future.  Be sure to protect yourself against these dishonest contractors.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>OPA MicroFIT contract applications require a number of pieces of information.  Anyone who has this information can apply for a MicroFIT contract on your behalf, whether you are aware of it or not.  This is a bad thing because once a MicroFIT application is accepted for your property, further applications will be ineligible.  This means that you may have great difficulty down the road making an intended application, either yourself or through a reputable contractor.  The original, unintended, application (dare I call it fraudulently submitted?) will have to come under your control or be terminated before your intended project can proceed.<p>
<p><h2>How to avoid fraudulently submitted MicroFIT applications</h2></p>
<p>Control access to the following information:</p>
<ul>
<li>Local Distribution Company (LDC) account number and name on the account</li>
<li>Legal description of your property (lot, concession, etc.)</li>
<li>Property Instrument Number (PIN)</li>
<li>Tax roll number</li>
</ul>
<p>Only give this information to a contractor once you've decided to work with that contractor and have a signed contract that clearly indicates how the application process will proceed.  Only work with a contractor who gives you access to the MicroFIT project web portal (username and password).</p>

<p><h2>What if there is an application already submitted?</h2></p>
<p>If you know or suspect that an application has been made without your explicit consent then demand confirmation from the contractor and demand access to the OPA MicroFIT web portal (username and password).  Once you have access change the password.  If you do not get access to the web portal then <a href="mailto:microFIT@powerauthority.on.ca">contact the OPA</a> and send them all the information listed above.  Request the status of any applications connected to any of those pieces if identity and explain your suspicion of fraudulently submitted applications.  Don't expect to hear back for 3 weeks.<p>

<p><h2>If a contractor started an application for you are you tied to that contractor?</h2></p>
<p>No.  You are only bound by any contract that you may have signed.  If there is no contract and you wish to not proceed with that contractor than demand access to your web portal and change the password.  If you signed a contract and changed your mind you may be liable for costs to the contractor as outlined in your contract.</p>

<p>If a contract application exists always try to get control of it, rather than having it terminated.  That way you get the benefit of the early time stamp on the original application vs the later time stamp on a new application<p>

<img alt="wolf.jpg" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/17/wolf.jpg"  class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>FIT Review:  What do you do?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/fit-review-what-do-you-do.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2011://2.43</id>

    <published>2011-11-16T13:40:12Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-16T16:07:12Z</updated>

    <summary>If you are contemplating installing a FIT or MicroFIT system in Ontario you are probably wondering how the FIT review process will affect your plans.  We have some recommendations.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The  <a href="http://microfit.powerauthority.on.ca/">MicroFIT</a> and <a href="http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/what-feed-tariff-program">FIT</a> program review process includes the temporary suspension of the program during the review.  This means that any applications submitted today will be subject to whatever the new rules and pricing is once the review process is finished.  How can plan your project without knowing the terms and pricing that you'll get?</p>

<h2>MicroFIT</h2>
<p>There is no cost to apply to the MicroFIT program.  There is no risk to apply.  By applying now you reserve your place in the queue once the OPA resumes processing applications based on the new rules.  If you don't like the new terms you can abandon your application.  We recommend proceeding with an application.  <a href="mailto:info@generationsolar.com?subject=MicroFIT web inquiry">We can help.</a></p>

<h2>FIT</h2>
<p>FIT applications require a small amount of work and a modest application fee.  The OPA has pledged to refund application fees for applicants unhappy with the revised terms.  FIT applications, then, are free of risk and valuable for securing a spot in the processing queue.  We recommend proceeding with an application.<a href="mailto:info@generationsolar.com?subject=FIT web inquiry">Contact us and we can help.</a></p>

<img alt="Array closeup" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/16/rahiri.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>FIT Review: Look abroad for examples</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/fit-review-look-to-uk-for-example.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2011://2.42</id>

    <published>2011-11-08T14:36:22Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-16T16:10:12Z</updated>

    <summary>The recently begun OPA FIT Review Process is harmful to the industry in Ontario because effectivity is backdated and because the OPA is not being transparent in addressing this issue.  See our recent post on this topic for more detail.  However we have only to look to the EU for interesting comparisons.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Like Ontario, the UK has a young and very popular FIT program.  Like in Ontario, UK politicians are concerned about the cost of the FIT program.  And so, like in Ontario, the UK is in the process of re-evaluating the details of the program and will be lowering FIT contract pricing.</p>
<p>Unlike Ontario, the UK appears to be going about this in a transparent and fair manner.  Namely:</p>
<ul>
	<li>The UK government is sharing the financial assumptions and evaluations on which it is basing its decisions; and</li>
        <li>The effectivity of the changes will be <b>after</b> they're announced, giving the whole supply chain time to adapt to the change while still actually operating on the existing pipeline of projects.
</ul>

<p>There are differences, of course, between the two programs.  The UK program is funded from a set reserve that is intended to last a set number of years.  If the reserve runs out early, the program won't be achieving its time targets. This closed-end program has clear limits to work within.  The Ontario program is open-ended, and that makes people very edgy.<p>
<p>Another difference is scale, but this is interesting:  The UK program, which is a bit younger than the Ontario program, has encouraged over 100,000 household-scale systems to be installed since it started, totalling over 400MW of production.  In Ontario, up to the end of October, the MicroFIT program has resulted in a mere 8,494 connected projects totalling 73MW of installed capacity.  The 'success' of the UK program is evident (in the context of needing to throttle back); that of the Ontario program is less so.  (Apparently there is a large number of MicroFIT projects in the queue, but for some reason this does not seem to be translating into actual construction; we're not sure why.)</p>

<p>Of course the best example of a FIT working well remains Germany, where FIT price degression is prescriptive based on installed capacity.  IE if the market grows by X, the rate will drop by Y.  If the market fails to grow by X, the FIT rate will not drop until it does.  This creates a very stable marketplace because the entire industry knows exactly how large the market will be at a given FIT rate, and so can plan accordingly.  Note that Germany is on track to install 5000MW of solar in 2011 alone.</p>

<img alt="MicroFIT Ground Mount" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/08/morrice.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>FIT and MicroFIT Scheduled Review Flawed, Hurts Ontario Industry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/fit-and-microfit-scheduled-review-flawed-hurts-industry.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2011://2.41</id>

    <published>2011-11-02T16:10:02Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-16T16:17:08Z</updated>

    <summary>The Ontario Power Authority has announced its 2-year review of the FIT and MicroFIT programs.  We think that&apos;s great!  Regrettably, though, they have back-dated the effectivity of any new rules and pricing to Sept 1, 2011, for MicroFIT applications and to December 8, 2010, for FIT CAE applications.  This back-dating appears to violate the FIT rules, as do other aspects of this review process.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ontarians should be proud of North America's most progressive FIT program.  However Ontarians should also be upset that the OPA appears to be violating both the spirit and letter of its own FIT rules in this Scheduled Program Review.  Namely:</p>
<ul>
     <li>FIT Rule 7.1(b) stipulates that <blockquote>The price incorporated into the FIT Contract that will be offered to applicants whose Applications have been accepted ... will be the applicable price as set out in the Price Schedule at the time of the Time Stamp.</blockquote>The Time Stamp is the date and time of electronic submission, as defined in Section 4.1(a).  Clearly, back-dating the effectiveness of this change violates rule 7.1(b)</li>
     <li>FIT Rule 10.1(b) stipulates that <blockquote>Notice of any Amendment as a result of a Scheduled Program Review will be posted on the Website at least 30 days prior to the effective date of such Amendment. </blockquote>For MicroFIT rule 7(b) states <blockquote>Notice of any amendment as a result of a Scheduled Program Review will be posted on the microFIT Program website at least 90 days before the effective date of the amendment</blockquote>Clearly, then, the earliest possible effectivity date for any changes as a result of this review would be 30 days (90 days for microFIT) after October 31st, when the Scheduled Program Review was announced. Any applications Time Stamped prior to that should be eligible for the rules prior to the Amendment.</li>
     <li>The FIT program was conceived to help create a stable and predictable market for renewable energy in Ontario and thereby establish and grow a new manufacturing sector.  This point was made several times during the OPA conference call on November 2nd, 10am EDT.  By back-dating the effectiveness of the Program Review and by having an open-ended program review the OPA is starving the market of projects that were applied for long ago and effectively blocking the market from securing new projects until the completion of the Review (and a known set of program rules and pricing).  This is yet another in a series of disruptions to the marketplace by the OPA, the sum of which acts as a tremendous disincentive to all levels of the supply chain:  Customers lose confidence in the solidity of the program and, by association, the viability of the technology; the entire pipeline of work dries up forcing layoffs by installers, distributors, and manufacturers; and financiers lose confidence in Ontario as a place to invest.  This is not a stable and predictable market.
</ul>
<p>The OPA and the Minister of Energy need to be called out on these apparent contract violations and clear market disruptions.  Supporters of solar in Ontario should contact their MPP and the Minister of Energy and complain that the FIT Review Process is flawed and is causing significant harm to a nascent industry that is only just getting established.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.ontario.ca/mei/en/2011/10/moving-renewable-energy-forward.html">Here's a link to the announcement</a></p>
<p><a href="mailto:cbentley.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org?cc=2yearFITreview@ontario.ca&subject=FIT Program Review Bad for Ontarians&body=Minister Bentley%0AThe FIT Program Review process is unfair to Ontarians and disruptive to industry.  Please instruct the OPA to eliminate the backdating of Review effectivity and to post, and meet, a deadline for Review completion.%0ARegards">Email Minister Bentley</a></p>

<img alt="Wall Mount Installation" src="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/11/08/mcmechan.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Ontario Election 2011</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/10/ontario-election-2011-1.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2011://2.39</id>

    <published>2011-10-07T19:50:49Z</published>
    <updated>2011-10-07T20:00:24Z</updated>

    <summary>The citizens of Ontario have voted in support of expanding green energy in Ontario!  The Green Energy Act and Feed In Tariff program are key tools for making this happen and with the incoming Liberal government support for these pieces of legislation should remain in Queen&apos;s Park.
Thank you to everyone who spoke to and messaged the candidates through Stand Up For Solar, SineONtario!, and other mechanisms.  You&apos;ve helped to raise the profile of solar in Ontario and sent a strong message to all incoming MPPs that solar is an important part of our future energy mix.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.standupforsolar.ca/">Stand Up for Solar</a> offers a number of educational tools for the public-at-large to
learn more about how solar energy works, the real costs associated with the production and
transmission of solar energy and important facts and figures associated with the industry.</p>

<p>
The website also provides one location for interested individuals to show their support for
solar energy and the government programs that help to make Ontario and Canada a positive
environment for investment in solar energy production.</p>

<p>Check out <a href="http://www.shineontario.com/">ShineONtario</a> as well -- another solar advocacy website, sponsored by some large companies active in Ontario.</p>

<p>
Also see <a href="http://www.wattsnext.ca/">Wattsnext</a> for a map of renewable energy projects in Ontario.</p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>2011 Canadian Solar Conference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/09/2011-canadian-solar-conference.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2011://2.37</id>

    <published>2011-09-06T20:34:53Z</published>
    <updated>2011-09-06T20:42:19Z</updated>

    <summary>Registration is open for the 2011 Solar Conference.  CanSIA expects some 5000 exhibition visitors and conference delegates to attend this dynamic two-day event in early December at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Solar Canada 2011 is the largest and most influential conference and trade show for the solar industry in Canada. The number of exhibitors at this annual solar marketplace increased from 40, in 2007, to 198 in 2010. And attendance jumped from 400 visitors, in 2007, to more than 4,000 last year.
</p>

<p>CanSIA, Canada's solar advocate, is working to support the solar industry's bid to have solar energy widely deployed throughout Canada as a recognized and established component of Canada's energy mix, enabled by a solar industry that competes on a global playing field. By 2015, the solar industry is expected to support more than 35,000 jobs in the economy and displace 15 to 31 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year, providing a safer, cleaner environment for generations to come. 
</p>

<p>(snipped shamelessly from the conference web site)</p>

<p>See <a href="http://www.solarcanadaconference.ca/websites/solar_canada_2011/index.php?p=4">this link</a> for more information and to register.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stand Up for Solar!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/09/stand-up-for-solar.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2011://2.29</id>

    <published>2011-09-06T20:00:45Z</published>
    <updated>2011-09-06T20:43:30Z</updated>

    <summary>Support solar energy and make a difference today by signing on at Stand Up for Solar and other solar advocacy tools. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[
<p>
<a href="http://www.standupforsolar.ca/">Stand Up for Solar</a> offers a number of educational tools for the public-at-large to
learn more about how solar energy works, the real costs associated with the production and
transmission of solar energy and important facts and figures associated with the industry.</p>

<p>
The website also provides one location for interested individuals to show their support for
solar energy and the government programs that help to make Ontario and Canada a positive
environment for investment in solar energy production.</p>

<p>Check out <a href="http://www.shineontario.com/">ShineONtario</a> as well -- another solar advocacy website, sponsored by some large companies active in Ontario.</p>

<p>
Also see <a href="http://www.wattsnext.ca/">Wattsnext</a> for a map of renewable energy projects in Ontario.</p>


]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>What our clients say</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.generationsolar.com/2011/09/client-testimonials.html" />
    <id>tag:www.generationsolar.com,2010://2.16</id>

    <published>2011-09-06T18:27:55Z</published>
    <updated>2013-01-22T21:23:44Z</updated>

    <summary> Again, we very much appreciate your generosity in taking time to help us out. If you ever need testimonials, don&apos;t hesitate to contact us, we would contribute high praise of your firm and the competence of both you and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Simon</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Testimonial" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="testimonials" label="Testimonials" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.generationsolar.com/">
        <![CDATA[<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>Again, we very much appreciate your generosity in taking time to help us out. If you ever need testimonials, don't hesitate to contact us, we would contribute high praise of your firm and the competence of both you and JP.</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">Richard Peachey</dt>  -->
</dl>

<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>Thanks for your dedication & leading experience.</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">Gail McIntyre</dt>  -->
</dl>

<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>Yesterday, we had the worst wind storm off the lake we have ever seen here - lots of tree limbs down and an entire tree across the street was uprooted and landed on our neighbour's house.  Wind gusts in excess of 100 km, easily.  As you know our property gets the unsheltered brunt of wind off the lake, but the solar system was fine.  Thanks for making the system secure against high winds!
</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">Ralph Torrie</dt>  -->
</dl>

<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>Communication was key and G.S. was excellent at keeping in touch. I would highly recommend the company. They were prompt and professional. Thank you.</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">Kelly Rahiri</dt>  -->
</dl>

<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>Very helpful people -- excellent service all around!.</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">Jennifer Clapp</dt>  -->
</dl>

<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>Hi Simon, I just wanted to say officially that it was a pleasure having the guys here. They worked steady and were always friendly and pleasant. The job looks great. The alignment on the panels, which I can imagine would be extremely difficult to keep nice and straight, looks great. The wiring, conduit  and layout of the inverters and boxes is very neat as well as the stuff on the pole. And they cleaned up after themselves at the end of it all.</dd>
<dd>Nice job and good bunch of guys too!</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">Pat Marcotte</dt>  -->
</dl>

<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>They always called ahead and explained what they were doing.</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">Carol Oldfield</dt>  -->
</dl>

<dl class="testimonial">
<dd>Their accessibility, personability, professionalism, honesty and their ability to complete the work on time with the pressure on. Wish we has more sub trades like this.
</dd>
<!--  <dt class="author">(Anonymous)</dt>  -->
</dl>



]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
